Alternative modernities and epistemic struggles for recognition in Turkish media: deconstructing Eurocentrism?

Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, Elif Gençkal-Eroler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The concept of modernity and its association with the West and secularism is being challenged with the rise of religious movements in the age of globalisation. This provides a fertile ground for alternative modernities, disconnected from the West and secularism, to surface. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the emergence of alternative modernities by drawing on insights from epistemic injustice and recognition theory, through an analysis of Turkish media outlets. Turkey serves as an illustrative case to examine the emergence of alternative modernities due to its long-standing tradition of incorporating Western modernity and its complex liminal identity between the boundaries of the East and the West. This paper argues that the period from 2005 to 2020 presented a window of opportunity for an alternative modernities paradigm to engage in epistemic struggles for recognition, supported by the ideological context of the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi or AKP) government. This period paved the way for questioning the superiority and uniqueness of Western modernity. However, it also indicates the birth of a new form of epistemic injustice as counter-narratives defending the superiority of Islamic civilisation emerged, seeking to establish epistemic hegemony for Islam and its association with modernity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2154-2172
Number of pages19
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alternative modernity
  • Eurocentrism
  • Turkey
  • epistemic injustice
  • recognition theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative modernities and epistemic struggles for recognition in Turkish media: deconstructing Eurocentrism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this