TY - JOUR
T1 - Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery
T2 - analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors
AU - European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP)
AU - Circular Stapled Anastomosis Working Group
AU - 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP)
AU - Pinkney, Thomas D.
AU - Tong, C.
AU - Jamous, N.
AU - Schmitz, N. D.
AU - Szwarcensztein, K.
AU - Morton, D. G.
AU - Battersby, N.
AU - Bhangu, A.
AU - Blackwell, S.
AU - Buchs, N.
AU - Chaudhri, S.
AU - Dardanov, D.
AU - Dulskas, A.
AU - Gallo, G.
AU - Glasbey, J.
AU - Kelly, M.
AU - Knowles, C.
AU - Li, Y. E.
AU - McCourt, V.
AU - Minaya-Bravo, A.
AU - Neary, P.
AU - Negoi, I.
AU - Nepogodiev, D.
AU - Pata, F.
AU - Pellino, G.
AU - Poskus, T.
AU - Sanchez-Guillen, L.
AU - Singh, B.
AU - Sivrikoz, E.
AU - van Ramshorst, G.
AU - Zmora, O.
AU - Pinkney, T. D.
AU - Perry, R.
AU - Magill, E. L.
AU - Keatley, J.
AU - Ahmed, S. E.
AU - Abdalkoddus, M.
AU - Abelevich, A.
AU - Abraham, S.
AU - Abraham-Nordling, M.
AU - Achkasov, S. I.
AU - Adamina, M.
AU - Agalar, C.
AU - Agalar, F.
AU - Agarwal, T.
AU - Agcaoglu, O.
AU - Agresta, F.
AU - Ahmad, G.
AU - Ainkov, A.
AU - Aiupov, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Background: Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists. Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Results: Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience. Conclusion: In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.
AB - Background: Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists. Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Results: Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience. Conclusion: In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207389573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089
DO - 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089
M3 - Article
C2 - 39441693
AN - SCOPUS:85207389573
SN - 2474-9842
VL - 8
JO - BJS Open
JF - BJS Open
IS - 5
M1 - zrae089
ER -