Comparative cross-sectional study on sexual function of couples during pregnancy: Assisted reproductive techniques versus spontaneous conceptions

Ozlem Dulger, Sinem Dinmez, Sebahat D. Torun, Usame O. Osmanoglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aims to compare the sexual functions of couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART) with those conceiving spontaneously during pregnancy. A total of 102 couples participated in this cross-sectional study, with 68 couples in the spontaneous conception group and 34 couples in the ART group. Data collection was conducted face-to-face in the antenatal clinic using separate “Descriptive Information Form” for women and men, “Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)” for women, and “Libido Scoring System (LSS)” for men. Descriptive statistical methods, Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, t-test, and Pearson correlation test were used for data analysis. It was observed that the mean FSFI total scores of women who conceived spontaneously and through ART during pregnancy were at a good level (≥30), while the mean LSS scores of their partners were at a moderate level (5-7). No statistically significant distinction existed among the groups. Further research is advisable by adjusting the sample selection criteria, such as gravida, duration of ART treatment, and gestational age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-93
Number of pages10
JournalAfrican journal of reproductive health
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Feb 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Asisted reproductive techniques
  • partner evaluation
  • pregnancy
  • sexual function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative cross-sectional study on sexual function of couples during pregnancy: Assisted reproductive techniques versus spontaneous conceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this