TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of different intraorifice barriers on the fracture resistance of roots obturated with resilon or gutta-percha
AU - Nagas, Emre
AU - Uyanik, Ozgur
AU - Altundasar, Emre
AU - Durmaz, Veli
AU - Cehreli, Zafer C.
AU - Vallittu, Pekka K.
AU - Lassila, Lippo V.J.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Introduction: This study investigated and compared the root reinforcement potential of 3 different intraorifice barriers (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA], resin-modified glass ionomer cement [Vitremer], and fiber-reinforced composite [FRC]) placed over root canals obturated with gutta-percha or Resilon. Methods: Crowns of 80 extracted human mandibular premolars were sectioned off to obtain 14-mm-long root specimens. After preparation of root canals with nickel-titanium rotary files, the roots were obturated with either the Resilon/Epiphany system or gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer. In both obturation groups, specimens were further subgrouped with respect to the intraorifice barrier material placed after removal of 3-mm coronal portion of the root fillings: (1) MTA, (2) Vitremer, and (3) FRC. The specimens were loaded vertically at 1 mm/min crosshead speed until vertical root fracture occurred. Results were evaluated statistically with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Results: Fracture resistance of roots was significantly affected by the type of intraorifice barrier (P <.05), but not by the type of obturation system used (P >.05). Conclusions: The use of Vitremer and FRC significantly improved the fracture resistance, whereas MTA did not exhibit any reinforcing effect as an intraorifice barrier.
AB - Introduction: This study investigated and compared the root reinforcement potential of 3 different intraorifice barriers (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA], resin-modified glass ionomer cement [Vitremer], and fiber-reinforced composite [FRC]) placed over root canals obturated with gutta-percha or Resilon. Methods: Crowns of 80 extracted human mandibular premolars were sectioned off to obtain 14-mm-long root specimens. After preparation of root canals with nickel-titanium rotary files, the roots were obturated with either the Resilon/Epiphany system or gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer. In both obturation groups, specimens were further subgrouped with respect to the intraorifice barrier material placed after removal of 3-mm coronal portion of the root fillings: (1) MTA, (2) Vitremer, and (3) FRC. The specimens were loaded vertically at 1 mm/min crosshead speed until vertical root fracture occurred. Results were evaluated statistically with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Results: Fracture resistance of roots was significantly affected by the type of intraorifice barrier (P <.05), but not by the type of obturation system used (P >.05). Conclusions: The use of Vitremer and FRC significantly improved the fracture resistance, whereas MTA did not exhibit any reinforcing effect as an intraorifice barrier.
KW - Fiber-reinforced composite
KW - fracture resistance
KW - intraorifice barrier
KW - mineral trioxide aggregate
KW - resin-modified glass ionomer cement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955307298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.006
DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 20478466
AN - SCOPUS:77955307298
SN - 0099-2399
VL - 36
SP - 1061
EP - 1063
JO - Journal of Endodontics
JF - Journal of Endodontics
IS - 6
ER -