Investigating Retrospective and Prospective Metamemory Judgments During Episodic Memory in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

  • Metehan Irak
  • , Volkan Topçuoğlu
  • , Tamer Numan Duman
  • , Serra Akyurt
  • , İrem Yılmaz
  • , İlknur Yaren Pala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is clear evidence that individuals diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) lack confidence in their memory and have low metamemory performance (judgment and accuracy). However, it is still unclear whether low metamemory performance is specific to first, domain general or domain specific, and second, to stimulus domain. To address these issues, we compared individuals diagnosed with OCD and healthy controls (HCs) on recognition, retrospective (judgments of learning [JOL]) and prospective (feeling of knowing [FOK]) metamemory judgments and under three different episodic memory tasks, which consisted of symptom-free, familiar and unfamiliar stimuli (word, scene, and face photo). OCD patients showed lower recognition performance, JOL and FOK judgments, and accuracy in all tasks than HCs. Also, OCD patients were slower than HCs during all cognitive performances. In both groups, metamemory performances were lower in familiar items than unfamiliar items. However, recognition performances were not affected by stimulus type. Our results support the idea of general episodic memory and a metamemory deficit in OCD. Moreover, metamemory deficits in OCD are domain general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-291
Number of pages15
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • episodic memory
  • feeling of knowing
  • judgment of learning
  • metamemory
  • obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • recognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating Retrospective and Prospective Metamemory Judgments During Episodic Memory in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this