TY - JOUR
T1 - Kidney Transplantation from Elderly Donor
AU - Tekin, S.
AU - Yavuz, H. Asuman
AU - Yuksel, Y.
AU - Yucetin, L.
AU - Ateş, I.
AU - Tuncer, M.
AU - Demirbas, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Aim In recent years, there has been an increase in usage of grafts from advanced-age donors because of the shortage of organ availability. Acceptance of elderly living-kidney donors remains controversial due to the higher incidence of comorbidity and greater risk of postoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the graft function and patient survival using kidneys from living-related and unrelated donors who were older than 65 years of age. Materials and Methods From December 2008 until December 2013 we compared the outcomes of 294 patients (mean age, 47.67 ± 12.4 years; range, 16 to 74 years old) who received grafts from donors ≥65 years old to 2339 patients who received grafts from donors who were younger than 65 years old. Results We observed no significant differences in sex, time on dialysis, or cold ischemia time between the groups. The recipient ages between two groups were similar. For survival analysis we used the Kaplan-Meier survival estimator. Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 91.1%, 89.1%, and 88.5%, respectively, for patients transplanted with kidneys from donors ≥65-years-old vs 96.7%, 95.9%, and 95.0%, respectively, in the <65-year-old donor group. Multivariate analysis showed the variables associated with patient survival to be donor age at time of transplantation in years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-1.71; P <.05), time on dialysis in months (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23; P =.002). Graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years censored for death with functional graft at was 97.6%, 96.4%, and 94.1%, respectively, for patients transplanted with kidneys from donors older than 65 years vs 97.5%, 96.8%, and 95.2%, respectively, in the <65-year-old donor group. Multivariate analysis, HLA-DR mismatches (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.55; P =.050), delayed graft function (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.53-2.07; P =.021), and perhaps acute rejection (HR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.82-1.95; P =.093) were the variables associated with graft survival. Conclusion We concluded that the use of kidneys from donors older than 65 years of age allows us to increase the rate of renal transplantation to approximately 15 to 20 per million population, with good graft and patient survivals provided that the protocol for expanded criteria organs ensured proper macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the organ for transplantation.
AB - Aim In recent years, there has been an increase in usage of grafts from advanced-age donors because of the shortage of organ availability. Acceptance of elderly living-kidney donors remains controversial due to the higher incidence of comorbidity and greater risk of postoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the graft function and patient survival using kidneys from living-related and unrelated donors who were older than 65 years of age. Materials and Methods From December 2008 until December 2013 we compared the outcomes of 294 patients (mean age, 47.67 ± 12.4 years; range, 16 to 74 years old) who received grafts from donors ≥65 years old to 2339 patients who received grafts from donors who were younger than 65 years old. Results We observed no significant differences in sex, time on dialysis, or cold ischemia time between the groups. The recipient ages between two groups were similar. For survival analysis we used the Kaplan-Meier survival estimator. Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 91.1%, 89.1%, and 88.5%, respectively, for patients transplanted with kidneys from donors ≥65-years-old vs 96.7%, 95.9%, and 95.0%, respectively, in the <65-year-old donor group. Multivariate analysis showed the variables associated with patient survival to be donor age at time of transplantation in years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-1.71; P <.05), time on dialysis in months (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23; P =.002). Graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years censored for death with functional graft at was 97.6%, 96.4%, and 94.1%, respectively, for patients transplanted with kidneys from donors older than 65 years vs 97.5%, 96.8%, and 95.2%, respectively, in the <65-year-old donor group. Multivariate analysis, HLA-DR mismatches (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.55; P =.050), delayed graft function (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.53-2.07; P =.021), and perhaps acute rejection (HR 1.14; 95% CI, 0.82-1.95; P =.093) were the variables associated with graft survival. Conclusion We concluded that the use of kidneys from donors older than 65 years of age allows us to increase the rate of renal transplantation to approximately 15 to 20 per million population, with good graft and patient survivals provided that the protocol for expanded criteria organs ensured proper macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the organ for transplantation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931347662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.015
DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 26093706
AN - SCOPUS:84931347662
SN - 0041-1345
VL - 47
SP - 1309
EP - 1311
JO - Transplantation Proceedings
JF - Transplantation Proceedings
IS - 5
ER -