Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Patients Undergoing Heart Valve Replacement

Tolga Sinan Guvenc, Ahmet Ekmekci, Mahmut Uluganyan, Gokhan Ertas, Hatice Betul Erer, Fatma Ozpamuk Karadeniz, Ozan Tanik, Ahmet Oz, Cevdet Kocogullari, Yalcin Velibey, Gurkan Karaca, Mehmet Eren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR) was found to be a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The ratio may also be a useful marker to predict mortality following valve replacement surgery.

METHODS: A total of 932 patients was enrolled retrospectively. Patients were allocated to three tertiles based on their NLR (group 1, NLR ≤1.90; group 2, 1.90 < NLR ≤2.93; group 3, NLR >2.93).

RESULTS: Patients in the highest tertile were older (p = 0.049, 95% CI 0.09-5.98), tended to have chronic renal failure (p = 0.028, OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.08-6.35), and had more frequent critical CAD on preoperative angiography (p <0.001, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.38-3.21). Postoperatively, patients in the highest NLR tertile had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than those in the first tertile (p <0.001, OR 4.67, 95% CI 2.37-9.20) and second tertile (p = 0.002, OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.32-3.86). Patients in the third tertile had the highest mortality at day 300 (log-rank p <0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for the second tertile was 1.8 (p = 0.11, 95% CI 0.88-3.79), and for the third tertile was 2.8 (p = 0.003, 95% CI 1.40-5.59).

CONCLUSIONS: The NLR is a useful parameter to assess postoperative in-hospital mortality risk after valvular surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-396
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Heart Valve Disease
Volume25
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Patients Undergoing Heart Valve Replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this