Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?

Evren Akpinar, Ahmet Sevencan, Osman Nuri Ozyalvac, Murat Onder, Muhammed Bilal Kurk, Yakup Alpay, Ilhan Avni Bayhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gender, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the appearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different between groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients’ contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip.

Translated title of the contributionTek taraflı FBEK hastalarının kontralateral kalçasının profilaktik olarak sabitlenmesi düşünüldüğünde hangi faktör daha güvenilirdir ?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-823
Number of pages6
JournalUlusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • In situ pinning
  • SCFE
  • modified oxford bone age score
  • prophylactic pinning
  • slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this