TY - JOUR
T1 - Early experience with PET scanning in thoracic tumours
AU - Kutlu, C. A.
AU - Pastorino, U.
AU - Maisey, M.
AU - Goldstraw, P.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background. Positron emission tomography (PET) scan is an imaging technique which relies on metabolic properties of the lesions. In this study, we evaluated the potential contribution of PET for thoracic malignancy in a consecutive series of patients presenting with multiple lesions or equivocal diagnosis. Methods. PET with 2-18 F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was carried out in 41 patients. The diagnosis was primary intrathoracic malignancy in 22 (Group 1). On routine staging using CT scan we found 29 additional lesions and assessed these using PET scan. PET was performed to evaluate the number of metastatic lesions in the lung in 11 (Group 2), to characterise undiagnosed pathology in the chest in 4 (Group 3), to search clinically suspicious extrathoracic spread in 4 patients with known intrathoracic malignancy. Results. In Group 1, the sensitivity and specificity of PET was 81.2% and 92.3%. The accuracy of PET in the confirmation of metastatic disease to the chest was 73%. PET was falsely positive in a patient with chronic inflammatory disease in Group 3 and highly accurate to characterise unknown pathology in Group 4. Conclusions. Even though infection may cause false positive results, PET is a useful imaging technique for the evaluation of patients with thoracic tumours.
AB - Background. Positron emission tomography (PET) scan is an imaging technique which relies on metabolic properties of the lesions. In this study, we evaluated the potential contribution of PET for thoracic malignancy in a consecutive series of patients presenting with multiple lesions or equivocal diagnosis. Methods. PET with 2-18 F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was carried out in 41 patients. The diagnosis was primary intrathoracic malignancy in 22 (Group 1). On routine staging using CT scan we found 29 additional lesions and assessed these using PET scan. PET was performed to evaluate the number of metastatic lesions in the lung in 11 (Group 2), to characterise undiagnosed pathology in the chest in 4 (Group 3), to search clinically suspicious extrathoracic spread in 4 patients with known intrathoracic malignancy. Results. In Group 1, the sensitivity and specificity of PET was 81.2% and 92.3%. The accuracy of PET in the confirmation of metastatic disease to the chest was 73%. PET was falsely positive in a patient with chronic inflammatory disease in Group 3 and highly accurate to characterise unknown pathology in Group 4. Conclusions. Even though infection may cause false positive results, PET is a useful imaging technique for the evaluation of patients with thoracic tumours.
KW - Lung neoplasms, diagnosis
KW - Neoplasms, diagnosis
KW - Tomography, emission, computed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034926836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11398041
AN - SCOPUS:0034926836
SN - 0021-9509
VL - 42
SP - 403
EP - 410
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -