TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of no-reflow and major adverse cardiovascular events with a new scoring system in STEMI patients
AU - Bayramoğlu, Adil
AU - Taşolar, Hakan
AU - Kaya, Ahmet
AU - Tanboğa, İbrahim Halil
AU - Yaman, Mehmet
AU - Bektaş, Osman
AU - Günaydın, Zeki Yüksel
AU - Oduncu, Vecih
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Background: No-reflow is associated with a poor prognosis in STEMI patients. There are many factors and mechanisms that contribute to the development of no-reflow, including age, reperfusion time, a high thrombus burden, Killip class, long stent use, ejection fraction ≤40, and a high Syntax score. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the parameters associated with no-reflow prediction by creating a new scoring system. Methods: The study included 515 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent PCI; 632 STEMI patients who had undergone PCI in another center were included in the external validation of the scoring system. The correlations between 1-year major adverse cardiac events and low/high risk score were assessed. Results: In this study, seven independent variables were used to build a risk score for predicting no-reflow. The predictors of no-reflow are age, EF ≤40, SS ≥22, stent length ≥20, thrombus grade ≥4, Killip class ≥3, and pain-balloon time ≥4 h. In the derivation group, the optimal threshold score for predicting no-reflow was >10, with a 75% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.809, 95%CI: 0.772-0.842, P < 0.001). In the validation group, AUC was 0.793 (95%CI: 0.760-0.824, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This new score, which can be calculated in STEMI patients before PCI and used to predict no-reflow in STEMI patients, may help physicians to estimate the development of no-reflow in the pre-PCI period.
AB - Background: No-reflow is associated with a poor prognosis in STEMI patients. There are many factors and mechanisms that contribute to the development of no-reflow, including age, reperfusion time, a high thrombus burden, Killip class, long stent use, ejection fraction ≤40, and a high Syntax score. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the parameters associated with no-reflow prediction by creating a new scoring system. Methods: The study included 515 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent PCI; 632 STEMI patients who had undergone PCI in another center were included in the external validation of the scoring system. The correlations between 1-year major adverse cardiac events and low/high risk score were assessed. Results: In this study, seven independent variables were used to build a risk score for predicting no-reflow. The predictors of no-reflow are age, EF ≤40, SS ≥22, stent length ≥20, thrombus grade ≥4, Killip class ≥3, and pain-balloon time ≥4 h. In the derivation group, the optimal threshold score for predicting no-reflow was >10, with a 75% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.809, 95%CI: 0.772-0.842, P < 0.001). In the validation group, AUC was 0.793 (95%CI: 0.760-0.824, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This new score, which can be calculated in STEMI patients before PCI and used to predict no-reflow in STEMI patients, may help physicians to estimate the development of no-reflow in the pre-PCI period.
KW - ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
KW - new scoring system
KW - no-reflow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045303837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joic.12463
DO - 10.1111/joic.12463
M3 - Article
C2 - 29193382
AN - SCOPUS:85045303837
SN - 0896-4327
VL - 31
SP - 144
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiology
JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -