TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevention of and interventions in workplace bullying
T2 - a global study of human resource professionals’ reflections on preferred action
AU - Salin, Denise
AU - Cowan, Renee L.
AU - Adewumi, Oluwakemi
AU - Apospori, Eleni
AU - Bochantin, Jaime
AU - D’Cruz, Premilla
AU - Djurkovic, Nikola
AU - Durniat, Katarzyna
AU - Escartín, Jordi
AU - Guo, Jing
AU - Işik, Idil
AU - Koeszegi, Sabine T.
AU - McCormack, Darcy
AU - Monserrat, Silvia Inés
AU - Olivas-Luján, Miguel R.
AU - Zedlacher, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - The aim of this study was to analyze Human Resource Professionals’ reflections on the prevention of and intervention in workplace bullying across different countries. More specifically, the study sought to identify what actions were, in the experience of human resource professionals, best to prevent and intervene in bullying and uncover organizations’ motives for engaging in such work. The study was conducted through semi-structured interviews (n = 214) in 14 different countries/regions, representing all continents and all GLOBE cultural clusters. Qualitative content analysis was performed to analyze the material. The findings indicate that bullying was largely conceptualized as a productivity and cost issue, and that was largely driving efforts to counter bullying. Training and policies were highlighted as preferred means to prevent bullying across countries. In contrast, there were large national differences in terms of preferences for either disciplinary or reconciliatory approaches to intervene in bullying. This study advances our understanding of what human resource professionals consider preferred ways of managing workplace bullying, and adds to our understanding of cross-national differences and similarities in views of this phenomenon. As such, the results are of relevance to both practitioners and scholars.
AB - The aim of this study was to analyze Human Resource Professionals’ reflections on the prevention of and intervention in workplace bullying across different countries. More specifically, the study sought to identify what actions were, in the experience of human resource professionals, best to prevent and intervene in bullying and uncover organizations’ motives for engaging in such work. The study was conducted through semi-structured interviews (n = 214) in 14 different countries/regions, representing all continents and all GLOBE cultural clusters. Qualitative content analysis was performed to analyze the material. The findings indicate that bullying was largely conceptualized as a productivity and cost issue, and that was largely driving efforts to counter bullying. Training and policies were highlighted as preferred means to prevent bullying across countries. In contrast, there were large national differences in terms of preferences for either disciplinary or reconciliatory approaches to intervene in bullying. This study advances our understanding of what human resource professionals consider preferred ways of managing workplace bullying, and adds to our understanding of cross-national differences and similarities in views of this phenomenon. As such, the results are of relevance to both practitioners and scholars.
KW - Bullying
KW - human resource professionals
KW - intervention
KW - multi-country study
KW - prevention
KW - qualitative content analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046018488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2018.1460857
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2018.1460857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046018488
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 31
SP - 2622
EP - 2644
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 20
ER -